Hindu Temple Beneath Varanasi’s Gyan Vapi Mosque? Court docket Orders Survey

A petition contended that Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb demolished an historic temple and constructed the mosque.

Varanasi:

A courtroom in Varanasi has ordered the Archaeological Survey of India to hold out a bodily survey

of the city’s Gyanvapi Mosque, positioned subsequent to the well-known Kashi Vishwanath Temple.

The courtroom ordered the survey whereas ruling on a three-decade previous petition, which contended that Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb had demolished an historic temple of “Lord Vishweshwar” and “constructed a mosque with the assistance of the ruins of the stated temple”.

In its order, the courtroom requested the Director Normal of the ASI to “represent a five-member committee of eminent individuals who’re consultants and well-versed within the science of archaeology, two out of which ought to ideally belong to the minority neighborhood”.

The courtroom additionally requested the ASI Chief to nominate an eminent individual — a scholar or a longtime academician — as an observer for the committee.

In its order, the courtroom stated, “The prime function of the Archaeological Survey shall be to search out out whether or not the spiritual construction standing at current on the ‘disputed web site’ is a superimposition, alteration or addition or there’s a structural overlapping of any form, with or over, another spiritual construction”.

The committee, the courtroom added, “shall additionally hint whether or not any temple belonging to the Hindu neighborhood ever existed earlier than the mosque in query was constructed or superimposed or added upon it on the ‘disputed’ web site'”.

The unique petition within the case was filed in 1991 however a clutch of Varanasi residents contended the mosque was constructed over an historic temple in 1664 by the Mughal emperor Aurangzeb.

R Shamshad, a member of the All-India Muslim Private Legislation Board, stated the lawsuit is non-maintainable and must be dismissed in view of a regulation made in 1991.

“A petition was filed searching for dismissal of this go well with on which the district courtroom has handed an order. Now the entire situation is pending within the Allahabad Excessive Court docket on whether or not the go well with could be heard or not. On this background, when the difficulty is pending within the Allahabad excessive courtroom, I don’t assume there’s any justification in such an order. Such an order shouldn’t have been handed at this stage,” he added.

Source link

Categories India

Leave a Comment